Something is going on, that s for sure. We don t need a smoking gun because the evedance is overwhel

For five years Martin Stubbs, a Canadian Cable TV Station Manager, used his own satellite dish to access NASA s downlink transmissions from numerous space shuttle missions, and went on to collect over 2500 hrs of footage. Footage which he claims to be the smoking gun of UFO evidence.
He is best known for the release of The Secret NASA Transmissions: The Smoking omni hotel new york Gun DVD in 2000 but has recently been gathering plenty of viewers on his Youtube page where he continues to release new footage.
This entry was posted by Benjamin Grundy on Tuesday, September 15th, 2009 at 17:41 pm and is filed under Space Astronomy , UFO Phenomenon . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
No, the object in the first video isn t moving away from the earth s gravitational pull. The camera is zooming in and in so doing it gives the appearance that the object is moving. It might just be a satellite or junk.
A lot of debunkers try to show that something is something else by faking a photo or whatever. But all that ever really proves is that they can recreate something that looks like something else. It does not explain what the original video was.
A lot of debunkers try to show that something is something omni hotel new york else by faking a photo or whatever. But all that ever really proves is that they can recreate something that looks like something else. It does not explain what the original video was.
hmmm, I was waiting for the object s to change speed or direction.. Kind of strange but definitely not the smoking gun of UFO evidence. Good job to the guy though for tapping into NASA s downlink, thats awesome! omni hotel new york lol
I don t know These space videos lost a lot of value for me once I saw the Discovery show that demonstrated the famous disk shaped ufo scenes omni hotel new york were nothing more than particles that were too close to the camera s lens. Once you can recreate a scene in a lab.. yeah, that s pretty much the end of it. I think the primary problem is the quality of the video and the fact that the sheer scale of whats being viewed (you know, that big chunk o earth) creates weird depth perception illusions Still interesting to see though!
As for the object that seems to be moving away from the earth s gravitational pull, keep in mind that you have no frame of reference to it s size or distance. It is probably small rock passing through the top of the atmosphere ( as in from behind the Earth ).
I wonder what would happen if NASA was confronted with this and had no where to run or weasel out? What would they do if back into a corner and had to say something? and I don t mean that this is space junk junk. Please just tell people the truth already, it s not like we don t know something is going on.
Of course, enthusiasts want to exaggerate the claims that these unknowns are UFOs and skeptics work hard attempting to debunk any speculation they re extraterrestrial or intelligently controlled or whatever (a lot of them, in fact, are paid to do just that). Most of the rest of us are trying to find a sort of middle ground.
But, it is difficult to find an explanation for an object traveling opposite of earth s gravitational pull as depicted by the small object in the second video. That is, if it wasn t controlled in some way by some entity or thing.
Of course, enthusiasts want to exaggerate omni hotel new york the claims that these unknowns are UFOs and skeptics work hard attempting omni hotel new york to debunk any speculation they re extraterrestrial or intelligently controlled or whatever (a lot of them, in fact, are paid to do just that). Most of the rest of us are trying to find a sort of middle ground.
But, it is difficult to find an explanation for an object traveling opposite of earth s gravitational pull as depicted by the small object in the second video. That is, if it wasn t controlled in some way by some entity or thing.
Cant say its space junk but i also have to comment that in my opinion its probably not a ufo as well, if i had to make an intelligent guess i would go with . most likely another neighboring satellite just making its daily orbit routine around the earth and reflecting the sun back . but hey who really knows not I.
Dude, there is nothing to confront the truth is that there are 3000 satellites orbiting around the earth, and thousands of pieces of debris, old satellites, etc. All I see in the video is something shiny, probably metallic, reflecting the sun s rays, or glowing because it s re-entering the earth s atmosphere.
If you go to his youtube channel, you can see the rest of his UFO videos. None of them prove anything, let alone the existence of intelligent extra-terrestrials visiting Earth, as this person claims. It does show, however, that he has a very overactive imagination.
But this is beside the point which many have already stated, that a camera s perspective is grossly distorted when viewing things omni hotel new york moving at these speeds at this distance omni hotel new york in vacuous three dimensional space.
If anyone has the DVD Earthlight (DVD taken from space shuttle in orbit), and have time on their hands to examine the DVD footage closely, you will see a few UFOs like these. I am not saying this disproves the UFO s in this story, but that it suggests that UFO s are so common in space that NASA didn t care about editing omni hotel new york them out on a commercially available DVD. UFO s to many pilots and astronautics are commonplace. Buzz Aldrin frequently talks about the UFO which the Apollo 11 crew saw following them on their way to the moon.
Ummm, a UFO is an unknown object. Any object your can t identify is a UFO. We cannot jump to conclusions that UFOs are space craft from other planets. I believe people DO see objects omni hotel new york that are not made by humans, but we still don t know what they are, or where they come from. I have seen these myself. We also know nothing about the entities people report having contact with. The simplistic answer is they are aliens from another planet somewhere. The real answer is probably something much stranger than that. We have stories omni hotel new york of humans interacting with non human entities for as long as we have been here. These used to be little people or fairies or angles or demons or whatever. They have abducted people way back in our history. It makes little sense for aliens to be doing this, so it s probably something else that we don t understand that makes itself look like aliens, or that s just the way we perceive them.
People see UFOs all the time. There are many good sightings my multiple people look at the recent case in China during the eclipse. And we do have good photos and video. omni hotel new york So why no photos of the grays? That will likely never happen. If they don t want to be photographed, they never will be. IF we can even photograph them in the first place. Much the same with ghosts.
Something is going on, that s for sure. We don t need a smoking gun because the evedance is overwhelming that people are seeing omni hotel new york things in the skies. I mean if fifty people came to your home and told you there is an elephant omni hotel new york on the front lawn, would you need them to show you a photo to believe them?
Problem is, we don t understand what is going on, and we have been looking at the wrong explanation of it. So we might not see UFOs in space around our planet because they don t need to do that. Observations show they can just appear and vanish. That said, they have been tracked coming in from space quite regularly.
What looked like an object moving away from earth in said video, could have been a satellite in orbit that just looked like it was moving away due to the perspective of the camera. Of course one might wonder why watching a satellite fly by would be of such interest to those controlling the camera? But what do I know?, I don t work for NASA! Maybe it is important.
That kind of debunking used to hold a lot of weight. There are reasons for that too. The reasons being that 30 years ago or so if someone saw an UFO and video taped it, one of their major claims was that it must be an alien craft because nothing else can make this effect/occurance .
The guy in Britain actually admitted to hacking into NASA files. These videos are available to anyone who has the (expensive) equipment to view them. This is why we should be grateful to Martin Stubbs for his work (which took 1000s of hours).
I think until we can conclusively prove that these slow straightforward moving dots are not condensation on the camera lens, then we can t label any of it conclusive (smoking gun). Only probably @5% of the time do these dots, beads, etc. ever change speed or direction and there are probable explainations for that 5% too. I m not saying there are no UFO s, alien spacecarft, etc. I m just saying that usually the most simple explaination is the correct explaination. Make a camera lens that is condensation proof, then these clips would be much more convincing!
Black Eyed Kids: Insidious Threat or Myth in the Making? omni hotel new york Mountain of the Dead: The Dyatlov Pass Incident The Ghost Face of the USS Arizona The Ningen: Myth, Monster or Make Believe? Smiles of the Dangerous Children Bizarre Spaceship-like Object Found at the Bottom of the Baltic Sea Mel Waters and the Devil's Holes Was Ghoulish Trail Camera "Zombie" a Publicity Stunt? Is Nicolas Cage Really a Vampire? The Bizarre Case of the Kera UFO Encounters