Q: Satellites experience less time because they re moving fast, but more time because they re so hig

Q: Satellites experience less time because they re moving fast, but more time because they re so high. Is there an orbit where the effects cancel out? Is that useful? | Ask a Mathematician / Ask a Physicist
The original question was : I read that due to time dilation from both gravity and speed, GPS satellites need their clocks adjusted to match Earth s time or else the whole idea would fall flat on its face. So my question is wouldn t there be a natural way to match the GPS clocks with Earth by simply having original london sightseeing tour the time dilation from movement offset the time dilation from gravity? How fast would they have to orbit the Earth to cancel out the gravitational original london sightseeing tour time dilation?
original london sightseeing tour Physicist : That s a really good question!  The thumbnail sketch of time dilation is: fast things and low things experience less time.  So satellites above our head experience a little more time because they re high, but a little less because they re moving.
It turns out that a satellite would have to orbit at about the same speed it would hit the ground if it fell, straight down, from the height of that orbit.  That orbit is 50% of the radius of the planet above the surface of the planet.  In the case of Earth, that s 1,975 miles up, well below the 12,600 mile altitude of the GPS network.  So, their on-board clocks run a little faster than identical ground-based clocks (a gain of about 1.7 seconds per century).
The time-slowing and time-speeding effects cancel at an orbital height of 50% of the planet s radius. At this altitude the orbital original london sightseeing tour speed, and the speed with which you d hit the ground falling from that height, are equal.
You can picture this in terms of someone at the higher location dropping clocks to someone at the lower location, who has an uncanny power to read speeding clocks. original london sightseeing tour The laws of physics, including the ones regarding time, act more or less the way they should in a zero-g environment.  For example, in zero gravity if you knock a cup off of a table it doesn t start magically moving (falling) for no reason.  Impossible!  The falling clocks are basically carrying an accurate record (not needing to worry about gravity) of the time frame from which they started falling.
As for fixing the problem: no problem. original london sightseeing tour Relativity, although difficult to wrap your head around, is no mystery.  We know exactly how fast time is passing for every satellite in the sky.  To deal with it, all that s needed is clocks that run at a slightly different rate.  The specifics can be found on page 7 of this .  Building a clock to keep a very particular incorrect time is exactly as difficult as building a clock to keep correct time.  No problem.
Answer Gravy : The general relativity can be approximated by using special relativity and how fast things fall works well so long as the gravity isn t really messing up spacetime.  Basically, it doesn t work on black holes, but it works great for planets and stars.  Once you figure out how fast something would be falling between original london sightseeing tour two levels, original london sightseeing tour you plug that into the gamma function , γ, which tells you how many times faster time is traveling at the higher level than the lower.
The speed, v, that an object with mass, m, will be going if it falls from somewhere in space, R, to ground level, r, can be found by looking at the difference in gravitational potential original london sightseeing tour energy and setting that equal to the gain in kinetic energy: .
In general the speed of the clocks on a satellite is faster than clocks on the ground by a factor of .  However, in this case we re looking for the overall factor original london sightseeing tour to be 1 (time is the same for the satellite as the ground).  So, v g = v s .
Q: Is it possible to fill a black hole? If you were to continuously throw galaxies worth of matter into a black hole, would it ever fill up? And what would theoretically happen if all the matter in the universe was thrown into a single black hole?
Q: If black holes are rips in the fabric of our universe, does it mean they lead to other universes? If so, then did time begin in that universe at the inception of the black hole? Could we be in a black hole?